@A MyBCTeam Member

You need to take K2 with vitamin D to make the calcium go to your bones and not clog your bloodstream. The calcium tablets especially do this rather than natural calcium in your diet
which is safe.

But to get even the natural calcium to your bones, you need Vitamin D + vitamin K.
My medical oncologist even said to take both vitamin D + K2.

I agree with everything you said
@A MyBCTeam Member and I always believed that. And thats one of the reasons I never liked doctors. Its not some big conspiracy how connected Big Pharma is to our health care system pushing drugs and protocols for treatments. Its a huge money-making business, the medical mafia. ❤️

Oncologists do not have the cure. They have protocols established from studies with probable outcomes. One thing they do know is that death for everyone is inevitable. Patients are often treated like cookies all cut from the same dough, but we are not exactly the same and our bodies respond differently to known treatments.

Then too, there is the lurking question as to their primary interest. Do they truly care about their patients or do they prefer the lucrative benefits of being a drug pusher? Big pharma has been known to push the drugs they create purely for profit. Their “dealers” are handed irresistible incentives, OxyContin being one example where profit was the motive for prescribing it.

As to the estrogen blockers used, they stay in our system for as much as 10 years after stopping them. My cardiologist openly informed me that the Tamoxifen I took for less than 3 months would take 6 months to clear from my body. I have yet to hear from my oncology team that the physical damages I have incurred from estrogen blockers will never actually go away after stopping the meds. I found through my own research they will also stimulate other health issues after the fact.
So, why the secrecy?

Any oncologist that tells a patient it’s their way or the highway should be sent down that same road. Yes, we need a cure, but perhaps focusing on ridding the causes of cancer might be another approach for consideration. Meanwhile, we patients try to hear what our bodies actually need to get and stay healthy until it’s time to go.

Barbara I will say that I switched to exemestane 5 days ago and don't have the terrible side effects that I did with anastrozole.

@A MyBCTeam Member, They are just plain NASTY, I can barely take mine not quite 70% of the time! My side effects have been wretched, and as we both say.. STUDY.. there are MULTIPLE ACTUAL fighters of this horrible disease, that will atest to the FACTS, they do NOT prevent recurrance, maybe a small percentage of the time! But if you truly study, mostly these AI's are helpful to reduce continual spread! I don't need anyone to say I am trying to be an expert, nor that I should not be spreading misinformation. We each should weigh the pros and cons, and do what is best for us as individuals! Moreover, I am flat out REFUSING the I forget what they are called , the bone infusions, you know for anti osteoperosis, as well as supposedly for osteopenia, whatever, my mom took all the crap, and still is BROKEN! I cannot prove it, but I think the AIs and the bone drugs give major heart problems, kidney problems, and I could go on! HUGS Barbara!!! <333