Why Won’t Oncologists Push For Pet Scans, Especially If You’ve Had 2 Types Of Cancers?
Back in 2017 I was diagnosed with invasive carcinoma in my cervix. Likely due to HPV. Caught early, no chemo needed, cleared with an biopsy and since my husband and I wanted a kid, we were told to basically get on it bc it would come back. It did. After my son was born in 2018, same, early stage, no chemo, hysterectomy took care of it. Fast forward to my DCIS HER2+ in my right and precancerous cells in both, opted for a double mastectomy. Again, got lucky, no chemo. Clear margins after my… read more
You might want to check out the liquid biopsy Signatera test! This will pick up any cancer cells in your blood prior to even a Pet scan. Some insurance companies cover this test now. Otherwise it’s around $1500. Worth doing with your history.
Because no one cares about prevention. They care about treatment. Plus PET scans are expensive so ins companies don’t want to pay for it. I think if you want a PET scan, say something is hurting, like your hip. Then they might do that. But remember, it’s also a lot of radiation. Not so great for your body. And PETs are not good for brain mets, you’d need an MRI for that. Just my 2 cents. Our world is less than perfect, so who really knows….
It's understandable to feel concerned given your family history and personal experiences with cancer. Here are some points to consider regarding PET scans and their use in breast cancer monitoring:
- PET Scans and Their Use: PET scans are typically used when there is a suspicion of metastasis, such as involvement of the Show Full Answer
Arimidex
Is Having A CAT Scan Show The Same Information That The Oncologist Gets The Same As You Get On A MRI?
How Do Bone Metastases Happen?